🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.